AMD is all set to launch its Radeon RX 7800 XT & RX 7700 XT RDNA 3 GPUs tomorrow & the official benchmarks have as soon as once more leaked out.
AMD’s Official “Reviewers Information” Benchmarks Present Single-Digit Beneficial properties For Radeon RX 7800 XT & RX 7700 XT GPUs Over Their Competitors However Provide Higher Worth
The official benchmarks come from inside the AMD “Reviewers Information” which is seeded to press as a reference of what sort of efficiency they’ll anticipate with the graphics card that they’re given for testing. On this case, we’re wanting on the efficiency benchmarks of the Radeon RX 7800 XT & the RX 7700 XT that are leaked by HDTechnologia and Videocardz, masking varied video games and artificial efficiency assessments.
Though the precise system affirmation is not talked about, we’re seemingly an AMD Ryzen 7000 CPU operating DDR5 reminiscence on an AM5 motherboard. The efficiency was measured in three completely different situations, first is the usual gaming rasterization, then we’ve got the ray tracing and at last, we’ve got the artificial benchmarks. For comparability, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has been in comparison with the RTX 4070 which prices $100 US extra ($599 US vs. $499 US) and the 7700 XT has been in comparison with the RTX 4060 Ti which prices the identical because the latest worth cuts ($449 US).
Beginning with the usual rasterization efficiency, we see that the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is on common 6,88% quicker than the RTX 4070 Ti throughout the 17 titles examined whereas the RX 7700 XT is on common 15.9% quicker than the RTX 4060 Ti. All video games have been examined out on 1440P and rasterization is normally a robust swimsuit with the AMD Radeon playing cards nevertheless fashionable titles are relying closely on a complicated set of graphical options similar to ray tracing and that is evident by the rising use of the expertise in consoles that are powered by AMD’s RDNA structure.
In ray tracing, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is -11.55% slower than the RTX 4070 & takes a big hit in Cyberpunk 2077 the place the efficiency falls by -69%. The RX 7700 XT ended up -5.4% slower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and whereas Cyberpunk 2077 is unquestionably an outlier right here, most of those video games examined are operating Ray Tracing that’s optimized round RDNA 2 and RDNA 3 {hardware} so including extra NVIDIA-optimized ray traced titles to the combination may end up in even greater losses within the RT division for camp pink. Summing up the outcomes:
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 16 GB ($499 US) vs NVIDIA RTX 4070 12 GB ($599US):
- Rasterization Efficiency: +6.88%
- Ray Tracing Efficiency: -11.55%
- Total Efficiency: +0.5% Quicker
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT 12 GB ($449 US) vs NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB ($449US):
- Rasterization Efficiency: +15.9%
- Ray Tracing Efficiency: –5.44%
- Total Efficiency: +8.5% Quicker
Lastly, there are the artificial efficiency benchmarks which as soon as once more present AMD taking the cake in rasterized benchmarks similar to 3DMark Fireplace Strike, 3DMark 11, and Time Spy however issues change as quickly as Port Royal benchmark is carried out. The Velocity Means benchmark is much more heavy in the case of ray tracing so anticipate each the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT & RX 7700 XT to be slower than the competitors in these too.
Wanting on the benchmarks, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT nonetheless presents a lot better worth and comes with a Starfield bundle which sweetens the deal. Additionally, you will get superior FSR 3 help however the Radeon RX 7700 XT is perhaps a troublesome one. Certain it does supply quicker efficiency than the 4060 Ti 16 GB however the latest worth cuts and the supply of the older RX 6800 16 GB GPUs can harm this card. Each playing cards are popping out this Wednesday and could have varied fashions to pick out kind similar to those we rounded up right here.
AMD Radeon RX 7000 RDNA 3 GPU Lineup:
Graphics Card | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 7600 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPU | Navi 31 XTX | Navi 31 XT | Ships 31 LE | Navi 32 | Navi 32 | Navi 33 XL |
Course of Node | 5nm+6nm | 5nm+6nm | 5nm+6nm | 5nm+6nm | 5nm+6nm | 6 nm |
Die Dimension | 300mm2 (Solely GCD) 522mm2 (with MCDs) |
300mm2 (Solely GCD) 522mm2 (with MCDs) |
300mm2 (Solely GCD) 522mm2 (with MCDs) |
~200mm2(Solely GCD) 150mm2(with MCDs) |
~200mm2(Solely GCD) 150mm2(with MCDs) |
204mm2 |
Transistors | 58 Billion | 58 Billion | 58 Billion | 28.1 Billion | 28.1 Billion | 13.3 Billion |
GPU WGPs | 48 | 42 | 40 | 30 | 27 | 16 |
Stream Processors | 6144 | 5376 | 5120 | 3840 | 3456 | 2048 |
TMUs/ROPs | 384 / 192 | 384 / 192 | 320 / 160 | 240 / 96 | 216 / 96 | 128 / 32 |
Recreation Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.0 GHz | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Increase Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
FP32 TFLOPs | 61 TFLOPs | 52 TFLOPs | 46 TFLOPs | 37 TFLOPs | 35 TFLOPs | 22 TFLOPs |
Reminiscence Dimension | 24GB GDDR6 | 20GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 |
Infinity Cache | 96 MB | 80 MB | 64 MB | 64 MB | 48 MB | 32 MB |
Reminiscence Bus | 384-bit | 320-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 192-bit | 128-bit |
Reminiscence Clock | 20 Gbps | 20 Gbps | 18 Gbps | 19.5 Gbps | 18 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 800 GB/s | 576 GB/s | 624 GB/s | 432 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
Efficient Bandwidth | 3.5 TB/s | 3.5 TB/s | 2.2 TB/s | 2.7 TB/s | 2.0 TB/s | 476.9 GB/s |
TBP | 355W | 315W | 260W | 263W | 245W | 165W |
PCIe Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Worth | $999 US | $899 US | $649 US (5299 RMB China) |
$499 US | $449 US | $269 US |
Launch | Dec, 2022 | Dec, 2022 | July, 2023 | September, 2023 | September, 2023 | Could, 2023 |