AMD Ryzen 5 7500F evaluate: an awesome worth gaming CPU if you will get it

AMD’s current-generation Ryzen 7000 processors have confirmed to be a number of the quickest gaming CPUs on the planet, however even the entry-level Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 5 7600X CPUs are nonetheless a reasonably large funding at $225/~£220 and $245/£240. Fortunately, there’s now a fair cheaper mannequin – the Ryzen 5 7500F – which cuts frequencies by a reasonably insignificant 100MHz and drops the built-in graphics in change for a decrease buy worth: $200 within the US or £255 within the UK with an A620 motherboard price £80, figuring out to round £175 for the CPU itself.

British system builder AWD-IT is one in all solely a handful of outlets providing the chip – in a variety of Ryzen 5 7500F plus motherboard bundles and pre-built methods – they usually’ve graciously despatched it over with its bundled AMD Wraith CPU cooler for us to check. We have now run it by our battery of recreation benchmarks and content material creation workloads to see the way it compares to a variety of opponents, from the similarly-affordable Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i5 13400F to the high-end Ryzen 9 7950X3D, Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Core i9 14900K.

The query we need to reply right here is easy: is there any convincing purpose to decide on the Ryzen 5 7600X or 7600 over the 7500F past broader retail availability? In earlier Ryzen generations, the most cost effective CPU at a given core depend was usually one of the best worth possibility, but it surely’s wise to check that assumption with these new Zen 4 elements.

*Contains A620 motherboard

As you possibly can see from the desk above, there’s little or no separating the Ryzen 5 7500F and 7600, with a comparatively modest step as much as the 7600X from there. All informed, the distinction in quoted increase frequencies from the most cost effective to costliest six-core Ryzen CPU accounts for simply 300MHz or simply over 5 %.

The cache configuration can also be the identical, and all three six-core Zen 4 CPUs help the identical PCIe 5.0 gadgets (one thing not at all times a given, eg the Ryzen 5600G not supporting PCIe 4.0 as a result of its windfall from laptop computer processors).

The 7600X additionally has a better rated TDP, however might be set to the identical 65W ‘eco’ setting because the 7500F if desired – whereas the 7500F can have its energy limits maximised to match the 7600X. The 7500F additionally lacks built-in graphics, although this characteristic tends to stay unused on gaming-focused methods with discrete graphics playing cards.

For our testing, we’re utilizing the identical primary setup as our Ryzen 7800X3D evaluate. Which means G.Talent Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 CL30 RAM and Asus’ RTX 3090 Strix OC. Cooling is supplied by an Eisbaer Aurora 240mm AiO. Our motherboard for AMD Ryzen 7000 CPUs is the ASRock X670E Taichi, whereas the Gigabyte Aorus Z790 Grasp takes care of our Intel CPUs.

For storage, we’re utilizing a 4TB Lexar NM790 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD – benchmarking has definitely been improved by the latest drop in NVMe SSD costs. Our rig is accomplished with a 1000W Corsair RM1000x energy provide. Testing was carried out with the most recent Home windows updates (22H2) and BIOS revisions (F11) put in.

Earlier than we get into the gaming benchmarks that make up pages two to 4, let’s shortly run by some fast content material creation benchmarks: a Cinebench R20 3D render and a Handbrake video transcode. These outcomes are helpful even in a gaming context as they set expectations for each single-core and multi-core efficiency in varied situations.

Cinebench’s R20 single-thread benchmark exhibits outcomes a contact over what we would anticipate to see from frequency alone, with a six % benefit for the 7600 over the 7500F and a 13 % benefit for the 7600X over the 7500F.

Issues are a lot nearer within the multi-core stakes, with only a one % lead for the 7600 over the 7500F whereas the 7600X leads the 7500F by simply 9 %. After all, we would anticipate to see a a lot smaller hole than that in gaming, the place not each CPU core and thread is utilised in a given second – and notably as resolutions climb and GPU load will increase.

It is a related story within the Handbrake video transcode check, the place our pattern file is transformed once more 9 % sooner on the 7600X than the 7500F in each H.264 and H.265 encodes, with the 7500F and 7600 inside margin of error of one another. The rise in frequency is mirrored in barely greater energy consumption on the higher-tier elements, with whole system energy peaking at 193W with the 7500F, 196W with the 7600 and 236W with the 7600X.

Now, let’s get into the meat and potatoes of our testing – a variety of video games and scenes that check your CPU in numerous methods. Select your favorite titles from the hyperlinks under or simply hit the following web page button to proceed.

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F evaluation