Screenshots of the criticism.
It is unclear who Particular person X really is, and the criticism doesn’t clarify how the feds discovered them. A spokesperson for the USA Lawyer’s Workplace of Northern District of California, which is prosecuting the case, declined to reply any questions concerning the hacker referred to as “Particular person X.”Investigators recognized a number of attention-grabbing Bitcoin transactions because of a “third social gathering bitcoin attribution firm” that discovered 54 transactions despatched from Silk Street wallets to 2 different wallets. On April 9, 2013, these two wallets despatched 69,471.082201 bitcoins to the pockets now seized by the feds.
Do you might have any info on this case? We’d love to listen to from you. You possibly can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Sign at +1 917 257 1382Wire/Wickr @lorenzofb, on OTR chat at lorenzofb@jabber.ccc.de, or e-mail lorenzofb@vice.com.
One firm that helped the investigators was Chainalysis, in keeping with the federal government’s press launch. “We supplied investigative help and the company used our software program to observe the funds,” Chainalysis co-founder and CSO Jonathan Levin instructed Motherboard in a web-based chat.For a minimum of a 12 months, hackers had been buying and selling a file that allegedly contained the Bitcoin, in hopes that somebody might crack the password defending it and steal the loot. Clearly, the feds obtained there first. This text was up to date so as to add a remark from Jonathan Levin, and to include the response from a U.S. Lawyer’s Workplace spokesperson.Joseph Cox contributed reporting for this story.
Would you prefer to learn extra tales about hacking, privateness, and surveillance? Subscribe to our pop-up ‘zine The Mail. The subsequent situation is about hacking tradition.
